Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: Virology. 2006 Dec 6;360(2):407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.048

Table 3.

Within and between host species comparisons of genetic distances between the two SIVmus groups, SIVgsn and SIVmon.

Gag Pol1 Pol2 Env
Aa: SIVmus-1 (1239 vs 1085) 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.11
B: SIVmus-2 (1246 vs 2500) 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.18
C: SIVgsn (71 vs 166) 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.15
D: SIVmon (CML1 vs NG) d 0.27 0.23 0.22
A vs Bb: mus-1 vs mus-2 0.24 0.43 0.38 0.19
A vs Cc: mus-1 vs gsn 0.26 0.48 0.32 0.46
B vs C: mus-2 vs gsn 0.26 0.44 0.32 0.44
A vs D: mus-1 vs mon 0.31 0.62 0.37 0.53
B vs D: mus-2 vs mon 0.32 0.59 0.49 0.51
C vs D: gsn vs mon 0.33 0.53 0.43 0.51
a

A, B, C, and D are within host species comparisons and are calculated by summing the branch lengths between isolates named in Gag, Pol1, Pol2 and Env trees in Figure 5.

b

A vs B is the average branch length between SIVmus-1 and SIVmus-2 in each of the trees in Figure 5.

c

A vs C, B vs C, A vs D, B vs D, and C vs D are between host species comparisons: A versus C is the average branch length between, SIVmus-01CM1085 and SIVgsn.99CM71, SIVmus-01CM1085 and SIVgsn-99CM166, SIVmus-01CM1239 and SIVgsn.99CM71 and SIVmus-01CM1239 and SIVgsn-99CM166 in each of the trees in Figure 5. Comparisons B versus C, A versus D, B versus D and C versus D were similarly obtained.

d

The distance could not be calculated in Gag for SIVmon since full-length gag sequence is not available for SIVmonNG.