Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jun 29.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006 Sep 1;16(22):5773–5777. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.08.078

Table 2.

IC50 results for a selected subset of urea compounds from Schemes 1 and 2

graphic file with name nihms21272f6.jpg

Compound IC50a(nM) Inhibitionb(%) R1 Mp (°C)
1{1} 0.5 ± 0.1 86 ± 9 Adamantyl 242–245
1{4} 0.5 ± 0.1 87 ± 8 c-Hep 158–167
1{12} 1.0 ± 0.1 76 ± 7 4-I–Ph– 198–201
1{13} 0.7 ± 0.1 81 ± 8 4-Cl–Ph 177–182
1{14} 0.6 ± 0.1 80 ± 6 4-Br–Ph 192–194
1{15} 0.9 ± 0.1 84 ± 7 4-OCF3–Ph 157–158
1{16} 1.2 ± 0.2 82 ± 5 4-CF3–Ph 171–174
1{34} 100 ± 5 2 ± 3 2-OCF3–Ph 158–160
1{38} 1200 ± 100 4 ± 3 2,6-Di-Me–Ph 196–199
1{39} 940 ± 60 1 ± 1 2,6-Di-Cl–Ph 181–187
1{40} 50500 ± 500 5 ± 3 2,6-Di-i-Pr–Ph 218–222
7 2.9 ± 0.2 62 ± 13 4-CO2Me–Ph 162–163
8 220 ± 5 nd 4-CO2H–Ph 269–285
9 2.0 ± 0.2 72 ± 6 3-CO2Me–Ph 116–123
10 590 ± 60 nd 3-CO2H–Ph 240–254

nd denotes not determined.

a

Determined via a kinetic fluorescent assay, results are means ± SD of three separate experiments.

b

Determined via an end-point fluorescent assay, results are means ± SD of three separate experiments.