. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Mar 9;32(3):301–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.016

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Analysis of HIV Testing in Correctional Agencies (n=289)

	Coefficient (SE)	OR	95% CI
*Centralization*
Administrator’s Education	⁻.27 (.14)^*	.76	.58 – 1.01
*Complexity*
Training/Development Scale	.08 (.05)^*	1.09	.99 – 1.19
Support Scale	.03 (.07)	1.03	.90 – 1.19
Importance of Substance Abuse Tx as compared to HIV Counseling/Tx	.10 (.15)	1.11	.83 – 1.47
*Formalization*
Formal Written Tx Protocol	⁻.05 (.28)	.95	.55 – 1.64
*Interconnectedness*
Relationship w/ Tx Programs Scale	.04 (.04)	1.05	.96 – 1.14
Relationship w/ Judiciary Scale	⁻.12 (.07)^*	.89	.78 – 1.01
Relationship w/ Corrections Scale	.04 (.04)	1.04	.96 – 1.13
*Organizational Resources*
Financial Resources Scale	.11 (.06)^*	1.12	.99 – 1.27
Staff Resources Scale	⁻.02 (.05)	.98	.90 – 1.08
Office/Physical Space Scale	⁻.00 (.05)	1.00	.90 – 1.10
*Size*
Natural Log of FTEs	.45 (.09)^**	1.57	1.31 – 1.88

⁻

2 Log likelihood=349.98; Model χ² =50.38, p<.001

p<.05 (one-tailed significance test)

^**

p<.01