Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr;120(1):38–45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01177.x

Table 2.

Local challenge of oral mucosa with gliadin. The presence of T cell subsets in the oral mucosal epithelium of patients with treated coeliac disease and healthy controls. The results of solvent provocation without gliadin in patients with treated coeliac disease are also shown

Cells/mm2; mean ±s.d.

Epithelium CD3+ CD4+ CD8+ αβ+ γδ+
Coeliac disease patients, n = 37
 Before challenge 193·0 ± 76·1* 76·1 ± 56·2 120·9 ± 93·7 114·5 ± 81·0**** 3·7 ± 12·4
 Supramucosal challenge 230·1 ± 162·0 162·9 ± 126·6** 204·1 ± 127·7*** 125·9 ± 117·3 43·7 ± 12·4
 with gliadin powder
 Submucosal challenge 148·9 ± 85·8 90·0 ± 58·3 93·3 ± 69·2 81·4 ± 53·5 1·4 ± 4·2
 with gliadin solution
 Solvent provocation, n = 12 88·0 ± 60·0 81·1 ± 71·4 95·3 ± 72·6 60·1 ± 50·7 0
Healthy controls, n = 10
 Before challenge 86·3 ± 86·5 46·3 ± 40·3 83·8 ± 85·3 67·5 ± 61·4 1·3 ± 3·5
 Submucosal challenge 80·0 ± 50·0 58·9 ± 39·1 57·8 ± 38·3 84·4 ± 50·8 4·0 ± 9·7
 with gliadin solution

Comparison of values in epithelium After a Bonferroni correction

CD patients:

*

versus submucosal P = 0·034

**

versus before P = 0·002

***

versus before P = 0·002

****

versus submucosal P = 0·052

Controls: Non-significant differences

The counts of cell types before not shown.