Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Body Compos Res. 2006;4(4):153–160.

Table 4.

Comparison by race of mean ± SD FFM and percent body fat determined by each instrument, shown as P scores

method Measure Mean values by race ANOVA (P) African-American vs Caucasian (P) Hispanic v. Caucasian (P) Hispanic vs African-American (P)

African-American (n=51) Hispanic (n=45) Caucasian (n=55)
DXA FFM (kg) 38.3 ± 7.1 34.3 ± 6.1 34.9 ± 6.8 0.007 0.010 0.692 0.005
Percent fat 27.2 ± 11.2 29.5 ± 10.8 26.4 ± 9.1 0.304 0.675 0.132 0.277
BCS FFM (kg) 39. 5 ± 8.4 38.9 ± 7.5 37.6 ± 7.7 0.473 0.231 0.447 0.747
Percent fat 24.7 ± 12.5 24.5 ± 10.9 20.5 ± 9.8 0.120 0.062 0.104 0.954
RJL FFM (kg) 38.0 ± 5.5 35.9 ± 5.3 36.3 ± 5.6 0.128 0.111 0.717 0.061
Percent fat 29.0 ± 12.3 28.3 ± 11.6 24.6 ± 10.1 0.103 0.047 0.105 0.762