Skip to main content
. 2001 Aug;125(2):300–309. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01573.x

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of different BM-DC injection in Lewis EAE rats induced by immunization with MBP 68–86 + FCA. EAE 87–99-DC, BM-DC were obtained from rats immunized with MBP 87–99 + FCA; following DC were obtained from rats immunized with MBP 68–86 + FCA. EAE-adDC, adherent DC from EAE rats (EAE 68–86-DC = group II); EAE-flDC, floating DC from EAE rats; EAE-LPS-DC, adherent DC from EAE rats were treated with LPS. Lewis rats were injected subcutaneously with the differently prepared DC at 1 × 106 DC/rat obtained from EAE rats 7 days p.i. (group II). After 4 weeks, such rats were immunized with MBP 68–86 + FCA. Rats receiving PBS (group I) or BM-DC from EAE (group II) served as controls. Arrows represent day of immunization. The data were obtained from 4–6 rats of two independent experiments. (a) • Control EAE (Group I); ▪ EAE 68–86-DC (Group II); ▴ EAE 87–99-DC. (b) • Control EAE (Group I); ▪ EAE-adDC (Group II); □ EAE-flDC; × EAE-LPS-DC.