Table 1.
Reported randomized trials of targeted agents in renal cell cancer
Trial (ref) | Eligibility | N | Experimental arm | Control arm | Median PFS | Median OS |
Motzer et al (24) | First-line, good and intermediate risk | 750 | Sunitinib | IFN α | 11 vs5 mo∗ | NA |
Escudier et al (25) | Second-line, good and intermediate risk | 905 | Sorafenib | Placebo | 24 vs12 wks∗ | 19.3 vs 15.9 mo∗ |
Escudier et al (26) | First-line, good risk | 189 (II) | Sorafenib | IFN α | NA | NA |
Yang et al(27) | Second-line, IL-2 refractory | 116 (II) | Bevacizumab (high-dose)† | Placebo | 4.8 vs 2.5 mo∗ | NA |
Bukowski et al (28) | First-line | 104 (II) | Bevacizumab + erlotinib | Bevacizumab | 9.9 vs 8.5 mo | NA |
Hudes et al (29) | First-line, poor risk | 626 | Temsirolimus‡ | IFN α | 3.7 vs 1.9 mo∗ | 10.9 vs 7.3 mo∗ |
∗Statistically significant.
†Study contained a low-dose bevacizumab arm that did not extend PFS.
‡Study contained another arm of temsirolimus + IFN that did not extend survival.
Ref indicates reference; N, number of patients; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; IFN, interferon; mo, months; NA, not available; II, randomized phase II trial; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.