Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007 Mar 23;18(5):898–909. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.01.017

Table 4.

Folate pools in exponentially growing E. coli. Data are from the average of two duplicate biological extracts each analyzed four times by LC-MS/MS. Reported values are the mean peak heights. Intra-sample reproducibility (determined from the four analytical runs of the first biological replicate) and inter-sample reproducibility (determined by comparing the two biological replicates) are shown in brackets as relative standard deviation (RSD). “0” indicates that no signal was detected; “+” indicates trace signal. Note that direct comparison of the signals between different compounds is complicated by different compounds having different response factors, i.e., different species give different ion counts when present in identical concentration.

n = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
pAB-Glun 0 + 4541
(16%, 1%)
0 0 0 0 0
PteGlun 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0
H2PteGlun 0 + 40540
(9%, 13%)
3250
(14%, 8%)
1208
(41%, 7%)
0 0 0
H4PteGlun 0 + 18893
(N/Aa, 3%)
+ 0 0 0 0
5,10-
CH=H4PteGlun
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5,10-CH2-
H4PteGlun
0 + 18300
(15%, 20%)
2172
(17%, 20%)
1312
(39%, 40%)
0 0 0
5-CH3-
H4PteGlun
5947
(10%, 12%)
11205
(27%, 23%)
270889
(19%, 18%)
40747
(8%, 4%)
11119
(18%, 9%)
1180
(42%, 14%)
0 0
5/10-CHO-
H4PteGlun
+ 696
(45%, 5%)
35301
(19%, 12%)
2106
(27%, 11%)
+ 0 0 0
a

H4PteGlu3 signal was found to decay monotonically following sample preparation with t1/2 ∼2 hr; therefore only results of the first analytical run on each sample, immediately following sample preparation, is reported.