Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 27;36(6):589–599. doi: 10.1007/s00249-006-0126-y

Table 2.

Average values and standard deviations of the geometric features defined in Fig. 3 together with the average number of hydrogen bonds between propranolol and E216 for the different MD-simulations at the initial and final stages of the inversion and mutation processes defined in Fig. 1

Simulations Propranolol CYP2D6 Average H-bonds NB-C5 distance (Å) F120 Cξ–C5–V370Cβ angle (deg)
e R-propranolol WT 2.2 4.7 ± 0.3 90 ± 6
f 2.2 5.4 ± 0.4 111 ± 9
g S-propranolol WT 2.4 4.7 ± 0.3 92 ± 5
h 2.6 4.5 ± 0.3 87 ± 4
i R-propranolol F483A 2.1 8.3 ± 0.5 159 ± 10
j 2.4 8.0 ± 1.9 138 ± 27
k S-propranolol F483A 2.7 10.5 ± 0.7 117 ± 12
l 2.1 8.6 ± 1.8 134 ± 23
q R-propranolol WT 2.4 6.6 ± 0.5 157 ± 13
r 2.2 4.8 ± 0.3 103 ± 6
s S-propranolol WT 1.5 4.6 ± 0.3 88 ± 5
t 2.2 4.8 ± 0.3 83 ± 4
u R-propranolol F483A 2.5 4.9 ± 0.6 104 ± 11
v 2.5 5.2 ± 0.7 101 ± 21
w S-propranolol F483A 1.7 5.0 ± 0.5 90 ± 6
x 1.7 4.9 ± 0.4 89 ± 5

The results belonging to approach 2 (defined in Fig. 1) are displayed in bold