Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 5;80(8):733–741. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0186-z

Table 1.

Potential confounders of the association between work-related risk factors and sick leave in patients with neck or upper extremity complaints

Potential confounders Categorization
Individual factors
 Age Continuous (per year)
 Sex Male versus female
 Smoking Present versus previous smoker
 Education Primary versus secondary; college/university
 Pain copinga: retreating (seven items) Continuous (scale 7–28)
 Pain copinga: worrying (nine items) Continuous (scale 9–36)
 Distress (six items) Continuous (scale 1–9)
General health
 ACSM position standc Norm not met versus norm met
 Norm healthy activity Norm not met versus norm met
 Perceived healthd Continuous (scale 1–5)
 Vitalityd (four items) Continuous (scale 0–100)
 Quality of life Continuous (scale 1–5)
Characteristics of the complaint
 Kind of complaint Localized versus generalized
 Duration of the complaint Categorical (<1, 1–4 weeks; 1–6 , >6 months)
 History of neck/upper limb complaints History versus no history
 Musculoskeletal co-morbidity Yes versus no
 Other co-morbidity Yes versus no
Work-related psychosocial factors (%)
 Decision authorityf (three items) Tertiles (low, medium, high)
 Job demandsf (five items) Tertiles (low, medium, high)
 Co-worker supportf (four items) Tertiles (low, medium, high)
 Job-securityf Low security versus high security
 Job as perceived cause of complaint Yes versus no

aPain Coping Inventory (Kraaimaat and Evers 2003; Kraaimaat et al. 1997)

bFour Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (Terluin 1998)

cAmerican College of Sports Medicine Position Stand (American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand 1990)

dMedical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (Ware and Sherbourne 1992)

ePhysical workload questionnaire (Bot et al. 2004)

fJob Content Questionnaire (Karasek et al. 1998); %work-related psychosocial factors were considered as potential confounders in the relation between work-related physical factors and sick leave