Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 1;74(3):425–437. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.04.024

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Doxepin inhibition of IHERG during action potential (AP) voltage clamp and of native IKr tails. (A) The upper traces show (leak corrected) representative currents of heterologously expressed IHERG in the absence and presence of 10 μM doxepin elicited by an AP clamp protocol (lower trace; voltage command applied at 4 s intervals). (B) Schematic representation of protocol used to assess blockade of native IKr tails by doxepin. (C) Representative tail currents from a rabbit ventricular myocyte upon repolarization from +20 to −40 mV in the absence (left panel) and in the presence of 100 μM doxepin (right panel). Upper traces show current records and lower traces show corresponding portion of the voltage protocol. The horizontal dashed line is drawn at the level of the current at −40 mV at the end of the initial (100 ms) step to −40 mV, against which peak IKr amplitude on repolarization from +20 to +40 mV was measured. (D) Mean fractional tail current block produced by three different concentrations of doxepin fitted with Eq. (2), which yielded an IC50 value of 4.4 (± 0.6 μM) with a Hill coefficient of 0.7 (± 0.1). Each drug concentration was applied to a minimum of twelve cells.