Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun;21(6):607–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00415.x

Table 3.

Comparison of Care Between Preintervention and Postintervention Groups

Process Indicator Preimplementation Quality Rate (%) (n =300)* Postimplementation Quality Rate (%) (n =300)* P-Value for Pre/Post Comparison
Subjective assessment 49.3 48.7 .866
Exam for pain complaint 26.0 26.0 .924
Other orders to assess pain 11.7 8.3 .171
New pain prescription 8.7 11.0 .331
Change existing pain meds 6.7 4.3 .208
Any other form of treatment 11.7 13.7 .461
Follow-up plan made 10.0 8.7 .567
Composite evaluation 50.0 50.3 .867
Composite treatment 26.0 28.3 .517
Any attention to pain 52.0 53.0 .802
*

Variables have the potential to be affirmative in 100% of patients, regardless of the presence or absence of pain.

P >.05 for all comparisons between pre and post groups using random effects (to account for physician clustering) logistic regression analysis; post hoc analysis indicated that a minimal difference of 6% to 10% could be detected between the groups.