Table 1.
N | Percentage of Respondents§ | |
---|---|---|
Teaching methods rated as used a large amount‡ | ||
Role-modeling by attendings | 114 | 69 |
Role-modeling by colleagues | 97 | 58 |
Teaching methods rated as used a small amount or not at all‡ | ||
Role-play | 142 | 85 |
Videotaped patient-physician interactions | 141 | 85 |
Standardized patients | 140 | 84 |
Teaching methods rated as preferred∥ | ||
Role-modeling by attendings | 145 | 85 |
Role-modeling by colleagues | 130 | 80 |
Evaluation and feedback | 122 | 75 |
Teaching methods rated as opposed§ | ||
Role-play | 117 | 72 |
Videotaped patient-physician interactions | 101 | 63 |
Standardized patients | 117 | 73 |
Teaching methods assessed were: role-modeling by faculty attendings, reflection/discussion of experiences, integration into existing education (e.g., noon conference), role modeling by colleagues, resident support group, evaluation and feedback, mentor program, videotaped patient-physician interactions, standardized patients, role-play, case-based scenarios, reading packet, web-based course, lectures, group problem-solving exercises, and other (specify).
For these results, only the methods with the largest percentages are displayed.
On a Likert ratings scale 0 to 4, “a large amount” = 4 and “a small amount or not used” < = 2
Small numbers of the 169 respondents did not answer individual questions (range of nonresponses 1 to 10), and reported percentages are based on total respondents for each question.
On a Likert ratings scale 1 to 5, “preferred” ≥4 and “opposed” ≤2