Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 1;56(532):830–835.

Table 2.

Median QOF points obtained in each domain by practice size.a

Number of WTE GP principals

Single-handed (1.00 WTE GP) Small practice (1.01–3.00 WTE GPs) Medium practice (3.01–5.00 WTE GPs) Large practice (5.01 GPs) P-valueb
Total QOF points, median (range) 944.1 (709.2–1000.0) 953.6 (505.2–1000.0) 953.0 (598.2–1000.0) 970.4 (505.2–1000.0) 0.003

Clinical points, median (range) 534.3 (394.5–550.0) 531.2 (309.4–550.0) 534.9 (327.3–550.0) 534.5 (278.1–550.0) 0.382

Organisational points, median (range) 172.0 (95.5–184.0) 171.0 (70.0–184.0) 172.5 (94.0–184.0) 179.0 (70.0–184.0) 0.002

Patient experience points, median (range) 100.0 (30.0–100.0) 100.0 (30.0–100.0) 100.0 (40.0–100.0) 100.0 (30.0–100.0) c

Additional services points, median (range) 36.0 (13.8–36.0) 36.0 (25.0–36.0) 36.0 (25.0–36.0) 36.0 (13.8–36.0) c

Holistic care points, median (range) 96.4 (50.0–100.0) 94.2 (34.5–100.0) 96.4 (32.6–100.0) 96.5 (32.6–100.0) 0.104

Quality practice payment, median (range) 27.1 (9.3–30.0) 28.4 (10.7–30.0) 30.0 (12.4–30.0) 30.0 (9.3–30.0) c
a

There were a total of 638 urban practices; data missing from 1 single-handed practice. Not all practices returned data in every domain, thus median difference for total QOF points is greater than the sum of the individual domains.

b

Median was compared across practice size using the median test.

c

Where medians are close to being identical, or are identical, the median test incorporated in STATA 9.2 will not report a test statistic or P value.

WTE = whole time equivalents.