TABLE 2.
Coverage of 90% credible intervals of selfing rates under models 1, 2, 3, and 6 with respect to specific population size and locus number based on 100 data sets per selfing rate combination (50 data sets for model 6)
Model 1
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample size | Locus no. | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
100 | 100 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.912 | 0.95 | 0.958 |
20 | 100 | 0.988 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.888 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
100 | 20 | 0.99 | 0.958 | 0.932 | 0.94 | 0.924 | 0.96 |
Model 2
|
|||||||
Sample size | Locus no. | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
100 | 100 | 0.976 | 0.878 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.882 | 0.914 |
20 | 100 | 0.732 | 0.892 | 0.734 | 0.938 | 0.93 | 0.91 |
100 | 20 | 0.772 | 0.99 | 0.742 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.91 |
Model 2
|
|||||||
Sample size | Locus no. | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
100 | 100 | 0.91 | 0.948 | 0.968 | 0.924 | 0.902 | 0.99 |
20 | 100 | 0.948 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.926 | 0.88 | 0.98 |
100 | 20 | 0.898 | 0.9 | 0.928 | 0.924 | 0.894 | 1.00 |
Model 3
|
|||||||
Sample size | Locus no. | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
150 | 100 | 0.948 | 0.958 | 0.948 | 0.832 | 0.92 | 0.97 |
30 | 100 | 0.962 | 0.976 | 0.916 | 0.856 | 0.932 | 0.86 |
150 | 20 | 0.964 | 0.97 | 0.964 | 0.792 | 0.868 | 0.954 |
Model 3
|
|||||||
Sample size | Locus no. | 0.25 | 0.6 | 0.85 | 0.05 | 0.45 | 0.75 |
150 | 100 | 0.89 | 0.924 | 0.97 | 0.816 | 0.818 | 0.836 |
30 | 100 | 0.852 | 0.884 | 0.896 | 0.788 | 0.91 | 0.892 |
150 | 20 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.978 | 0.766 | 0.972 | 0.968 |
Model 6
|
|||||||
Sample size | Locus no. | 0.05 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.95 |
300 | 100 | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.840 | 0.800 | 0.860 | 1.000 |
Each data set was run for five independent MCMCs, with 1,000,000 iterations, 500,000 burn-in iterations, and a thinning interval of 10 iterations (for model 6 one chain per data set). The proposal method for selfing rate here is the AIS.