Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 22;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-51

Table 5.

Characteristics of included trials of Low Level Laser Therapy for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis

First author, publication year Intervention type, treatment period No of patients on active therapy (n = 187) Method quality Mean baseline pain (mm VAS) Best mean difference (95% CI) of change over placebo (mm VAS) Outcome assessment timepoints (weeks, best time point used in bold)
Bulow-94** 25 mW, 830 nm, 2.25 J to 10 points 3 times/week, 9 total sessions 15 2 82.0 8.0 (-10.8 to 26.8) 3, 6
Gøtte-95 12 mW, 904 nm, 12 J in 4 points, 3 times/week 12 total sessions 20 3 69.0 25.0 (9.4 to 40.7) 4
Gur-03 10 mW, 904 nm, 2 or 3 J applied to 2 points, 2–3 times week/10 total sessions 60 4 73.9 25.0 (18.9 to 31.1) 4, 8, 12
Hegedu-06 50 mW, 830 nm, 6 J applied to 8 points, 2 times/week, total 8 sessions 14 3 57.5 25.1 (2.5 to 47.7) 4, 6, 12
Nivbrant-92 4 mW 904 nm, 0.7 J in 3 points, 3 times/week, 6 total sessions 15 4 67 19 (2.4 to 35.6) 2, 6
Stelian-92 2.7 mW and 25 mW 904 + 820 nm, 1.3 J and 11.1 J in two points 10 times/week, 20 total sessions 18 4 72.0 41 (25.4 to 56.6) 2, 10
Tascioglu-05** 50 mW 830 nm, 1.5 or 3 J in 5 points, 5 times/week, 10 total sessions 20 3 66.5 -0.9 (-11.8 to 10) 3
Yurtkuran-06 ** 4 mW, 904 nm, 0.48 J in one acupoint (Sp9), 5 times/week, 10 total sessions 25 5 - -0.7 (-18.6 to 17.2) 2, 12
Best within 4 weeks, all trials†† 187 17.7 † (8.1 to 27.3)
Best within 4 weeks, optimal 142 24.2 (17.3 to 31.1)
6–8 weeks 104 15.5 (9.9 to 20.9)
12 weeks 99 12.3 (6.7 to 17.9)
Total 187 3.5* 70.3† 3*

*Mean † Weighted mean †† Random effects model used for calculation ** Non-optimal dose