Skip to main content
. 2007 May 11;73(13):4162–4170. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00485-07

TABLE 3.

Comparison of A domain specificity codes from CMN and VIO NRPSs

CMN or VIO NRPS componenta Specificity codeb Amino acid proposed to be activatedc
CmnF D A Q S L A V V l-2,3-DAP
VioF D A Q S L A I V l-2,3-DAP
CmnA, A1 D V Y H F S L V l-Ser (or l-Ala)
VioA, A1 D V Y H F S L V l-Ser
CmnA, A2 D V R S L S M V l-2,3-DAP
VioA, A2 D V R H M S M V l-Ser
CmnG D P Q D I G I V CAM
VioG D P Q D V G I G CAM
CmnO D T E D V G T M β-Lys
VioO D T E D V G V G β-Lys
a

NRPS components are grouped according to homology (e.g., VioF is the homolog of CmnF). CmnA and VioA each contain more than one A domain. The first A domain is noted as A1, and the second is noted as A2.

b

Specificity code as described in references 6 and 30. The alignment program to identify the substrate specificity code is available at http://www.tigr.org/jravel/nrps.

c

This proposal is based on the results of the A domain substrate specificity code and the chemical structures of CMN and VIO. CAM, 2S,3R-capreomycidine.