Table 2.
The comparison among KinasePhos 2.0, DISPHOS, PredPhospho, GPS, PPSP and KinasePhos 1.0
Tools | DISPHOS | PredPhospho | GPS | PPSP | KinasePhos 1.0 | KinasePhos 2.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | Logistic regression | SVM | MCL+GPS | BDT | MDD+HMM | CP+SVM |
Number of kinases | – | 4 groups | 71 groups | 68 groups | 18 | 58 |
Kinase PKA | – | Sn = 0.88 | Sn = 0.89 | Sn = 0.90 | Sn = 0.91 | Sn = 0.92 |
Sp = 0.91 | Sp = 0.91 | Sp = 0.92 | Sp = 0.86 | Sp = 0.89 | ||
Kinase PKC | – | Sn = 0.79 | Sn = 0.82 | Sn = 0.82 | Sn = 0.80 | Sn = 0.84 |
Sp = 0.86 | Sp = 0.83 | Sp = 0.86 | Sp = 0.87 | Sp = 0.86 | ||
Kinase CK2 | – | Sn = 0.84 | Sn = 0.83 | Sn = 0.83 | Sn = 0.87 | Sn = 0.87 |
Sp = 0.96 | Sp = 0.88 | Sp = 0.90 | Sp = 0.85 | Sp = 0.86 | ||
Serine | Acc = 0.76 | Acc = 0.81 | – | – | Acc = 0.86 | Acc = 0.90 |
Threonine | Acc = 0.81 | Acc = 0.77 | – | – | Acc = 0.91 | Acc = 0.93 |
Tyrosine | Acc = 0.83 | – | – | – | Acc = 0.84 | Acc = 0.88 |
Histidine | – | – | – | – | – | Acc = 0.93 |
Overall performance | – | Acc = 0.76 ∼ 0.91 | – | – | Acc = 0.87 | Acc = 0.91 |
SVM, support vector machine; MCL, Markov cluster algorithm; GPS, group-based phosphorylation scoring method; BDT, Bayesian decision theory; MDD, maximal dependence decomposition; HMM, hidden Markov model; CP, coupling pattern; Sn, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; Acc, accuracy.