Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;196(1):531–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.026

Table I.

Review of the literature on postnatal follow-up in children that had increased nuchal translucency (NT) with normal karyotype at 11–14 weeks of gestation

Population Cut-off value for NT Prevalence of increased NT and normal karyotype Liveborn neonates Method of assessment of child development Postnatal follow-up (months) Lost for follow-up Developmental delay * n(%) and 95%CI
Van Vugt (7) NA 3.0mm NA 50 Questionnaire 33.5 (7–75) 32% 1/34 (2.9%) [0%–15%]
Adekunle (8) Screening 4.0mm 0.8% 31 Questionnaire 23.0 (13–38) 26% 2/23 (8.7%) [l%–28%]
Maymon (9) Referral 95th centile NA 36 Telephone 24 (12–36) 0% 0/36 (0%) [0%–10%]
Brady (10) Referral 3.5mm NA 90 Clinical examination NA 6–42 1.1% 1/89 (1.1%) [0%–6%]
Hippala (11) Screening 3.0mm 0.8% 59 Clinical examination 56 (24–84) 15% 1/50 (2.0%) [0%–11%]
Senat (12) Referral 4.0mm NA 58 Clinical examination 39 (12–72) 7% 3/54 (5.6%) [1%–15%]
Cheng (13) Screening 3.0mm 0.74% 14 Clinical examination/Telephone 21 (8–30) 0 1/14 (7.1%) [0%–34%]
Souka (14) Referral 3.5mm NA 980 NA NA 0 4/980 (0.4%) [0.1%–1%]
*

% and 95% confidence interval are calculated from the original article

NA: not available