Skip to main content
. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13577–13582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13577

Table 1.

Summary of crystallographic analysis

Native1 Native2 I-dU5 I-dU13 I-dU24 I-dU25
Resolution, Å 2.5 3.0 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.0
Reflections, observations/unique 64,023/12,347 99,488/7,275 89,523/8,962 65,181/7,208 66,596/7,287 62,038/7,237
Data coverage, % 93.6 93.4 97.0 95.4 80.8 88.4
Rsym, % 8.0 7.5 6.7 8.7 9.6 6.6
Mean fractional isomorphous difference, % 13.7 18.9 10.0 18.6
MIR analysis, 20.0–3.0 Å against Native2
 Phasing power 1.27 0.69 0.83 0.86
Rc 0.61 0.69 0.68 0.69
 Mean overall figure of merit 0.62
Refinement (against Native1)
 Resolution, Å 6.0–2.5
R factor/free R factor, % 21.2/33.0
 Reflections, |F| > 2.0σ|F| working/test 9,726/1,121
 Total no. of atoms 1,809
 No. of water molecules 86
 rms bond length, Å 0.016
 rms bond angle, degrees 2.07
 rms B-factor bonded atoms, Å2 2.29

rms, Root mean square.