Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul;5(4):310–319. doi: 10.1370/afm.706

Table 1.

Practitioner Characteristics by Study Group Exposure to Active Management of Risk in Pregnancy at Term (AMOR-IPAT)

Practitioner Specialty* Number of Deliveries Overall Induction Rate, % Preventive Induction Rate, % PGE2Use Rate, % Attendance Rate,%
Exposed group (n = 794 deliveries)
Family physician 1 104 50.0 38.5 40.4 91.3
Family physician 2 80 35.4 15.8 24.4 95.1
Family physician 3 91 38.5 19.8 27.5 95.6
Obstetrician 1 438 29.0 17.1 20.8 90.8
Family physician 4 79 25.3 15.2 21.5 91.1
Nonexposed group (n = 1,075 deliveries)
Obestritician 2 231 28.1 10.8 10.4 90.8
Family physician 5 49 20.4 16.3 10.2 87.5
Family physician 6 75 18.7 9.3 21.3 96.0
Family physician 7 136 19.8 7.4 16.2 94.0
Obstetrics group§ 584 18.8 5.1 18.2 97.7

PGE2 = prostaglandin E2.

Notes: Number of deliveries and practitioner rates of labor induction (all types), preventive labor induction, PGE2 usage, and attendance at continuity delivery.

* All obstetricians and no family physicians or certified nurse-midwives had cesarean delivery privileges at the study hospital.

† Total N = 1,869 deliveries.

‡ The percentage of labors the practitioner attended; 21 patients did not have information concerning delivering physician.

§ This large obstetrics group had 7 practitioners and shared both prenatal care and deliveries. The composition of this group—practitioner type (number of deliveries)—was obstetrician (256), obstetrician (132), obstetrician (12), certified nurse-midwife (143), obstetrician (3), certified nurse-midwife (2), and obstetrician (36).