Skip to main content
. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13665–13670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13665

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Demonstrating the effect of the environment on the nature of hydrogen bonding and the independence of our conclusions on the model used. The figure considers the HO HOH system in vacuum and in water, representing the results of ref. 22 in a schematic way. Gas-phase calculations are presented for a single distance R = 2.4 Å between the oxygen atoms, while the calculations in solution are presented for both R = 2.8 Å (——) and for a least energy path where R is allowed to change upon displacement of the hydrogen (---). The distance R is short in vacuum, and the corresponding potential for proton motion is flat, reflecting the fact that H12 is similar in magnitude to Δgdia. On the other hand, in polar medium, a barrier is induced because the concentrated charge of the O−1 H—O configuration is solvated more than the delocalized ½O···H···O½ charge distribution. Now Δgdia has a large solvent contribution and becomes larger than H12. Both the AI and the EVB calculations confirm that the short bond in vacuum is indeed strong and that in water a longer OHB is the most stabilized form. Furthermore, it is clear that the ordinary bond in water is more stable than the “strong” bond in vacuum.