Table 6.

Area under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Values with 95% Confidence Intervals among Visual Field Defect Comparison Groups

	Visual Field Defect (Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm)	Visual Field Defect (Short Wavelength Automated Perimetry)	Visual Field Defect (Frequency Doubling Technology)
Discam
ACDR	0.70 (0.61–0.79)	0.71 (0.49–0.93)	0.53 (0.35–0.70)
VCDR	0.73 (0.64–0.81)	0.73 (0.57–0.90)	0.51 (0.34–0.69)
HCDR	0.65 (0.56–0.74)	0.66 (0.41–0.91)	0.56 (0.39–0.73)
HRT
ACDR	0.72 (0.62–0.83)	0.63 (0.12–1.00)	0.66 (0.52–0.79)
Stereo photos
VCDR	0.71 (0.61–0.81)	0.64 (0.38–0.90)	0.67 (0.42–0.91)
HCDR	0.65 (0.54–0.76)	0.64 (0.38–0.90)	0.61 (0.31–0.90)
Visual field
MD (SITA)	0.84 (0.76–0.91)	—	—
PSD (SITA)	0.90 (0.85–0.95)	—	—
MD (SWAP)	—	0.49 (0.28–0.70)	—
PSD (SWAP)	—	0.83 (0.70–0.96)	—
MD (FDT)	—	—	0.76 (0.64–0.89)
PSD (FDT)	—	—	0.82 (0.70–0.94)

ACDR = cup-to-disc area ratio; FDT = frequency doubling technology; HCDR = horizontal cup-to-disc ratio; HRT = Heidelberg Retina Tomograph; MD = mean deviation; PSD = pattern standard deviation; SITA = Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm; SWAP = short wavelength automated perimetry; VCDR = vertical cup-to-disc ratio.