Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 13;7:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-33

Table 3.

The performance of methods 1 to 4 at different levels of proportions of selected indicators

MI† B† MI100+BI† MI10+BI†
c-index slope c-index slope c-index slope c-index slope




Threshold n AP BC BC n AP BC BC n AP BC BC n AP BC BC

90% 5 0.74 0.71 0.86 6 0.74 0.71 0.85 3 0.74 0.71 0.86 4 0.72 0.71 0.85
80% 8 0.76 0.71 0.85 8 0.76 0.72 0.83 5 0.74 0.71 0.84 5 0.74 0.71 0.85
70% 10 0.76 0.71 0.77 12 0.78 0.72 0.80 11 0.77 0.72 0.79 11 0.77 0.72 0.80
60% 13 0.77 0.72 0.70 18 0.79 0.71 0.75 27 0.79 0.70 0.67 26 0.79 0.70 0.64
0% (full model) 31 0.80 0.70 0.65 31 0.79 0.69 0.65 31 0.80 0.70 0.64 31 0.80 0.70 0.65

n: number of indicators selected in the multivariable models.

AP: apparent index

BC: bootstrap corrected index

† Applied to the models that were developed when a p-value of 0.5 was used.