Table 5.

Means and T-ratios for Hierarchical Linear Modeling Comparisons Between Groups for Wives

	Personal impact of conversations			Personal impact of interviews			Relationship impact of questionnaires			Relationship impact of interviews
Groups	M	SE	t	M	SE	t	M	SE	t	M	SE	t
Non-IPV, happy to	5.35	.27	−0.07	4.94	.27	0.27	4.93	.35	−0.21	4.86	.32	−0.59
Non-IPV, distressed	5.33	5.03	4.86	4.67
Non-IPV, happy to	5.35	.39	0.84	4.94	.35	1.52	4.93	.48	1.13	4.86	.45	1.35
IPV, distressed	5.64	5.52	5.47	5.47
Non-IPV, happy to	5.35	.32	1.87*	4.94	.30	1.37	4.93	.39	1.47	4.86	.39	1.18
IPV, happy	5.91	5.43	5.50	5.32
Non-IPV, distressed	5.33	.37	0.98	5.03	.32	1.41	4.86	.42	1.46	4.67	.38	2.08*
to IPV, distressed	5.64	5.52	5.47	5.47
Non-IPV, distressed	5.33	.30	2.21	5.03	.26	1.24	4.86	.31	2.05*	4.67	.31	2.10*
to IPV, happy	5.91	5.43	5.50	5.32
IPV, distressed to	5.64	.41	0.78	5.52	.34	0.26	5.47	.45	0.07	5.47	.44	−0.34
IPV, happy	5.91	5.43	5.50	5.32

^*p < .05,

^**p < .01

Note. IPV = Intimate Partner Violence.