Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;80(9):623–631. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200309000-00006

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Visual evoked potentials recorded the same tree shrew (0028) as in Fig. 1 but using smaller check sizes (0.25° × 0.29°, ∼1.9 cpd). The tuning (change in first positive peak [P1] amplitude with trial lens power) is shown graphically in Fig. 3. Numbers to the right of each line indicate the number of waveforms that were averaged with this check size and trial lens power in this recording session. The thin lines indicate ±1 SD in response amplitude.