Table 1.
Encoding condition | Pictures | Words |
---|---|---|
Incidental nonsemantic | 64.8 ± 3.5 | 46.1 ± 4.9 |
Incidental semantic | 73.0 ± 3.4 | 73.5 ± 4.6 |
Intentional learning | 83.9 ± 2.6 | 76.9 ± 4.6 |
Values are percent of “old” items correctly identified (i.e., proportion of hits) expressed as mean ± SE. N = 23 [12 subjects from pilot study and 11 from positron emission tomography study (one positron emission tomography subject had missing data)]. There was a significant main effect of stimulus type (F = 10.1, P < 0.004), a significant main effect of encoding condition (F = 39.4, P < 0.0001), and a significant interaction of stimulus type and encoding (F = 4.2, P < 0.025).