Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):1007–1014. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01232.x

Table 4.

Factors Associated with Inconsistent Preference Trajectories in Multivariable Analysis:

WILLINGNESS TO UNDERGO HIGH
BURDEN THERAPY TO AVOID DEATH
WILLINGNESS TO RISK PHYSICAL
DISABILITY TO AVOID DEATH
WILLINGNESS TO RISK COGNITIVE
DISABILITY TO AVOID DEATH

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Number of interviews 1.9 (1.5, 2.4) 1.7 (1.3, 2.2) 1.9 (1.5, 2.4)
Diagnosis
 Cancer 1.0 (Reference) 1.0 (Reference) 1.0 (Reference)
 COPD 2.0 (0.8, 5.4) 1.7 (0.7, 4.2) 2.5 (1.0, 6.1)
 HF 1.5 (0.5, 4.1) 1.3 (0.5, 3.3) 1.7 (0.7, 4.4)
Inconsistent ADL trajectory 0.6 (0.2, 1.5) 1.1 (0.4, 2.5) 0.8 (0.3, 1.9)
Inconsistent SRH trajectory 1.5 (0.7, 3.4) 2.3 (1.0, 5.2) --
Inconsistent QOL trajectory -- -- 1.8 (0.8, 3.8)
Initial preference at the
extreme (wants therapy despite
99% chance of death/ 100%
chance of disability)
0.5 (0.2, 1.0) 0.3 (0.1, 0.8) 0.6 (0.2, 2.0)

COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HF = heart failure; ADL = activities of daily living; SRH = self-rated health; QOL = quality of life.