Table 2.
Transfection |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1–GFP | L1–GFP | L1–GFPΔCter | NrCAM–GFP | |
Ligand | L1–Fc | Anti-L1 | L1–Fc | TAG-1 |
koff (h−1) | 6.1 ± 1.6 | 1.0 ± 0.5** | 2.2 ± 0.8* | 0.18 ± 0.07**** |
n | 24 | 13 | 17 | 8 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, where n is the number of beads tested. Turnover rates were found to be statistically different by ANOVA and compared with the L1–GFP/L1–Fc condition by Tukey's test (*p = 0.06; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.001). Data for NrCAM-GFP at TAG-1 bead contacts in B104 neuroblastoma cells were obtained previously (Falk et al., 2004) and are reanalyzed here.