Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cell. 2007 May;12(5):727–738. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.02.011

Figure 3. aPKC’s effects on polarity cues.

Figure 3

(A) Arm colocalizes with Baz in puncta in gastrulating apkcm/z mutants (arrows). (B) Arm in WT spot junctions. (C) Lack of PAR-6 and (G) Crb enrichment at Baz puncta in gastrulating apkcm/z mutants. Both have reduced cortical enrichment at both gastrulation (C, G) and after germband extension (E, I) versus WT (D, F, H, J). (K) Dlg overlaps with DE-Cad puncta in gastrulating apkcm/z mutants and localizes to apical surface membrane (arrow), as in WT (L, arrow; inset shows a side view at this stage). (M) Dlg continues to localize to apical surface membrane after apkcm/z mutant germband extension (arrow; inset shows a side view at this stage), in contrast to WT where Dlg localizes below DE-Cad (N, a slightly oblique section in which the top of the panel is above the embryo surface; inset shows a side view at this stage). Bar, 5μm.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure