Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug;176(4):2611–2623. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.070011

TABLE 1.

Effect of number of markers (M) under the FPD on the confidence interval (C.I.) of QTL location, comparisonwise error rate (P-value), and statistical power, according to the test for significance and standardized allele substitution effect at the QTL (d/σ), using simulated data

C.I.
P-value
Power
d/σ M Δ SD Σ(λf)2 max|λ| max-χ2 Inline graphic Inline graphic Σ(λf)2 (%) max-χ2 (%)
0.2 25 4.1 3.1 0.003 0.053 0.007 0.015 0.074 99 56
13 5.1 3.3 0.002 0.030 0.008 0.018 0.076 99 59
7 6.4 3.6 0.004 0.049 0.006 0.016 0.061 98 64
0.15 25 4.9 5.2 0.008 0.104 0.056 0.067 0.250 92 27
13 6.3 5.2 0.021 0.071 0.126 0.112 0.260 90 24
7 7.8 5.9 0.021 0.098 0.130 0.101 0.299 89 28

Tests of significance: Σf)2, max|λ|, max-χ2, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic See text for details. Power was calculated at P-value = 5%. Values Δ and SD characterize the center and size of the confidence interval obtained in jackknife iterations (see text). Parameters of the simulations: chromosome length 120 cM. A single QTL was situated in position 40 cM. Number of families, F = 10 (5 families, sire heterozygous at the QTL; 5 families, sire homozygous at the QTL); number of daughters per family, N = 2000; proportion of the population selected to each tail, 0.10; number of subpools per tail, S = 4. Values are the mean based on 10 simulation data sets; for every data set, 500 permutations and 100 jackknife iterations were made.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure