TABLE 2.
Distribution of marker types by linkage group, map length by linkage group, distance between adjacent markers, number of contigs anchored to the genetic map, and physical coverage per linkage group
| Map length (cM)
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage group | No. of markers
|
Average distance between adjacent markers | No. of contigs anchoreda | Coverage of anchored contigs (Mbp) | |||||
| Total | EST | BES | SSR | AFLP | Total | ||||
| 1 | 48 | 9 | 15 | 7 | 17 | 80.0 | 1.67 | 20 | 17.68 |
| 2 | 62 | 15 | 13 | 8 | 26 | 47.0 | 0.76 | 15 | 16.17 |
| 3 | 35 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 16 | 45.8 | 1.31 | 13 | 16.09 |
| 4 | 51 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 18 | 66.8 | 1.31 | 18 | 16.95 |
| 5 | 49 | 8 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 67.0 | 1.37 | 21 | 21.84 |
| 6 | 51 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 17 | 65.2 | 1.28 | 19 | 15.05 |
| 7 | 64 | 8 | 21 | 12 | 23 | 88.8 | 1.39 | 25 | 25.12 |
| 8 | 60 | 13 | 23 | 9 | 15 | 76.9 | 1.28 | 23 | 21.78 |
| 9 | 42 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 18 | 58.3 | 1.39 | 14 | 11.68 |
| 10 | 55 | 5 | 17 | 9 | 24 | 61.7 | 1.12 | 24 | 17.43 |
| 11 | 49 | 8 | 12 | 7 | 22 | 67.5 | 1.38 | 17 | 17.20 |
| 12 | 47 | 9 | 17 | 4 | 17 | 59.6 | 1.27 | 16 | 22.25 |
| 13 | 51 | 7 | 19 | 5 | 20 | 72.4 | 1.42 | 27 | 22.42 |
| 14 | 58 | 10 | 18 | 10 | 20 | 62.1 | 1.07 | 20 | 25.01 |
| 15 | 45 | 4 | 11 | 6 | 24 | 49.4 | 1.10 | 13 | 8.42 |
| 16 | 49 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 24 | 67.3 | 1.37 | 19 | 12.72 |
| 17 | 38 | 3 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 62.4 | 1.64 | 15 | 17.69 |
| 18 | 85 | 22 | 24 | 6 | 33 | 92.7 | 1.09 | 27 | 27.94 |
| 19 | 55 | 7 | 22 | 5 | 21 | 54.1 | 0.98 | 21 | 18.29 |
| Total | 994 | 170 | 313 | 132 | 379 | 1245 | 1.25 | 367 | 351.73 |
EST, expressed sequence tag marker; BES, BAC end-sequence marker; SSR, simple sequence repeat marker. Linkage groups are numbered according to the Vitis vinifera map of Adam-Blondon et al. (2004). Distances are in Kosambi centimorgans.