Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 10;81(3):576–581. doi: 10.1086/519496

Table 2. .

NOBOX Sequencing Results in 96 White Women with POF

Allele Frequency(%)
Patients with POF
Controls
Sequence
Variation
Location Amino Acid Variation dbSNP ID Wild
Type
Heterozygote Homozygote Wild
Type
Heterozygote Referencea
c.42T→C Exon 1 Synonymous rs1208179 71.9 28.1 0 d, e
c.66T→C Exon 1 Synonymous Novel 98.96 1.04 0 100 0 d, e
c.262C→T Exon 3 Synonymous rs727714 11.5 45.8 42.7 d, e
c.1064G→A Exon 6 p.Arg355His Novel 99.0 1.01 0 100 0 d, e
c.1079G→Ab Exon 6 p.Arg360Gln Novel 99.0 1.01 0 99.3 .7 d, e
c.1154+11T→C Intron 6 rs757388 11.5 45.8 42.7 d, e
c.1155−22G→A Intron 6 rs11769847 11.5 45.8 42.7 d, e
c.1354G→Ab Exon 8 p.Asp452Asn Novel 99.0 1.01 0 94.8 5.2 d, e
c.1444G→A Exon 8 p.Gly482Ser rs2525702 72.9 26.0 1.1 d, e
c.603–51G→T Intron 8 rs11979528 29.2 44.8 26.0 f, g
c.682T→C Exon 9 p.Phe228Leu rs2699503 14.6 47.9 37.5 f, g
a

d = GenBank accession number NM_001080413. e = NCBI protein database accession number XP_001134420. f = Ensembl accession number ENST00000389325. g = Ensembl accession number ENSP00000373976.

b

Allelic frequencies between the general population and patients with POF show no significant differences (Fisher’s exact test P>.05)