Table 3.
PARTNER CHARACTERISTICS1 | SERVICE PROVISION2 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site | # Partners Per Site | Population3 Of Focus | Power Broker | Interest/New HIV Initiative | Foster Collaboration | Community Presence | C2P Buy-In | Research Interest | GAF | TP | YF | HIVF |
1 | 19 | YWSM | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 7 |
2 | 16 | YMSM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 4 | 8 |
3 | 13 | YWSM | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 6 |
4 | 19 | YMSM | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 3 | 15 |
5 | 21 | YWSM | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 11 |
6 | 19 | IVDU | 4 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 19 | 10 | 12 | 12 |
7 | 21 | YWSM | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 21 | 9 | 3 |
8 | 23 | YMSM | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 5 |
9 | 12 | YMSM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 | 7 | 4 |
10 | 20 | YWSM | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 9 | 4 |
11 | 17 | YMSM | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 3 |
12 | 20 | YWSM | 3 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 19 | 11 | 11 |
13 | 20 | YWSM | 3 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 11 | 20 | 15 | 7 |
14 | 20 | YWSM | 3 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 7 |
15 | 21 | YMSM | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 18 | 14 | 4 |
Total | 281 | 30 | 52 | 66 | 67 | 56 | 39 | 65 | 258 | 152 | 107 | |
% of total partners* | 11% | 19% | 23% | 24% | 20% | 14% | 59% | 92% | 54% | 38% | ||
| ||||||||||||
Average #/site with identified characteristic: | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total | 19/site | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 18 | 10 | 7 |
Characteristics = partner was considered a “power broker”, expressed particular interest in new HIV initiatives, would foster collaboration, had significant community presence, had significant C2P “buy-in”, and/or was interested in research collaboration.
Service = GAF: Serves Geographical Area of Focus, PF: Serves Population of Focus; YF: Youth Focused; HIVF: HIV Focused
Population of Focus = YWSM: Young Women Who Have Sex with Men; YMSM: Young Men Who Have Sex with Men; IVDU: Intravenous Drug Users
Questions on characteristics were not mutually exclusive and partners could use more than one characteristic to describe themselves. Thus, total percents add up to more than 100%.