Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 16;93(9):1126–1133. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.103002

Table 3 Microbial isolates from sternal wound (per‐protocol analysis).

No. of patients Control group (n = 99) Study group (n = 87)
With SWI 25 8
With positive growth 19 7
With multiple organisms 10 5
With Gram‐positive bacteria* 10† 4†
Staphylococcus aureus 4 2
Enterococcus faecalis 8 2
 Number of Gram‐positive organisms resistant to cefuroxime 2 2
 Number of Gram‐positive organisms resistant to rifampicin 4 1
 Number of Gram‐positive organisms resistant to vancomycin 0 0
With Gram‐negative bacteria 15† 7†
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2 3
Bacteroides fragilis 2 1
Enterobacteriaceae 14 7
Enterobacter cloacae 1 1
Escherichia coli 12 5
Proteus mirabilis 1 1
Klebsiella pneumoniae 0 2
Serratia marcescens 0 1
With other organisms
Candida albicans 1 0

SWI, sternal wound infection.

*Flucloxacillin was often used as the preferred treatment, blind, and may have contributed to the low number of isolates.

†Patients may have more than one organism.