Table 3.
Characteristics of Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, and Transdisciplinary Research
| Participants/ Discipline | Problem Definition | Research Style | Presentation of Findings | Examples from Infectious Disease Literature | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multidisciplinary | Two or more disciplines | Same question but different paradigm OR different but related questions | “Parallel play” | Separate publications by participants from each discipline | Medicaid cost containment and access to prescription drugs, Cunningham (2005),Lichtenberg (2005): The effect of access restrictions on the vintage of drugs used by Medicaid enrollees |
| Interdisciplinary | Two or more distinct academic fields | Described/defined in language of at least two fields, using multiple models or intersecting models | Drawn from more than one, with multiple data sources and varying analysis of same data | Shared publications, with language intelligible to all involved fields | The “Minimizing Antibiotic Resistance in Colorado” Project: Impact of patient education in improving antibiotic use in private office practices, Gonzales et al. (2005) |
| Transdisciplinary | Two or more distinct academic fields | Stated in new language or theory that is broader than any one discipline | Fully synthesized methods, may result in new field | Shared publications, probably using at least some new language developed for translation across traditional lines | Assessing the implementation of the Chronic Care Model in quality improvement collaboratives, Pearson et al. (2005) |