Table 5.
Mean (Low-Income Children)−Mean (High-Income Children) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
If Public Coverage Increased to: | With Effects of Public Coverage Estimated from 2SLS (%) | With Effects of Public Coverage Twice as Big as That Estimated from 2SLS (%) | Current Differences in the Analysis Sample (%) | |
Unmet dental care need | 50% | 4.8 | 3.2 | 6.4 |
Last visit ≤6 months | 50% | −16.9 | −13.7 | −20.3 |
Last visit ≤12 months | 50% | −11.9 | −7.4 | −16.4 |
Note: The method used in the simulation is the following: Changes in dental access and use are the multiples of the estimated effects of public coverage from 2SLS and the hypothesized 20% increase of public coverage (e.g., −.079 × 0.2 = −.0158 for unmet dental care need). The changes are then added to the sample means to obtain the new levels of dental access and use among low-income children when the public coverage was expanded from 30% to 50% (.1–.0158 = 0.0842 for unmet dental care need). The figures in column 3 are the differences between the new levels of dental access and use among low-income children and that of the high-income children (.0842–.036 = 0.048 for unmet dental care need). In column 4 we double the estimated effects of public coverage from 2SLS.
2SLS, two-stage least squares regressions.