Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug;42(4):1544–1563. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00699.x

Table 5.

Simulated Differences in Dental Care Access and Use between Children from Low and High Income Families

Mean (Low-Income Children)−Mean (High-Income Children)

If Public Coverage Increased to: With Effects of Public Coverage Estimated from 2SLS (%) With Effects of Public Coverage Twice as Big as That Estimated from 2SLS (%) Current Differences in the Analysis Sample (%)
Unmet dental care need 50% 4.8 3.2 6.4
Last visit ≤6 months 50% −16.9 −13.7 −20.3
Last visit ≤12 months 50% −11.9 −7.4 −16.4

Note: The method used in the simulation is the following: Changes in dental access and use are the multiples of the estimated effects of public coverage from 2SLS and the hypothesized 20% increase of public coverage (e.g., −.079 × 0.2 = −.0158 for unmet dental care need). The changes are then added to the sample means to obtain the new levels of dental access and use among low-income children when the public coverage was expanded from 30% to 50% (.1–.0158 = 0.0842 for unmet dental care need). The figures in column 3 are the differences between the new levels of dental access and use among low-income children and that of the high-income children (.0842–.036 = 0.048 for unmet dental care need). In column 4 we double the estimated effects of public coverage from 2SLS.

2SLS, two-stage least squares regressions.