Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct;41(5):1876–1894. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00579.x

Table 1.

Sample Sizes for Intervention and Control Groups in the Analyses Associated with the Four Interventions

Intervention Group Control Group


Intervention/Analysis Source Sample Size Source Sample Size
Member mailings and advertising* Members living in Michigan Physicians 31,576 Members living outside of Michigan Physicians 106,732
Patients 188,216 Patients 194,171
Claims 4,637,462 Claims 5,152,602
Generic sampling Patients of physicians selected for generic sample program Physicians 289§ Patients of physicians not selected for generic sampling program 31,287
Patients 22,163 Patients 166,053
Claims 422,449 Claims 4,215,013
Physician incentive Patients of group practices selected for physician incentive program Physicians 1,127 Patients of matched groups not selected for physician incentive program Physicians 980
Patients 39,474 Patients 31,934
Claims 773,414 Claims 569,508
*

The member-to-physician ratio is higher for the intervention group because the density of BCBSM members is higher in Michigan than in any other state

The intervention group counts members and claims of members if they were associated with a physician that participated in the generic sampling intervention at any point during the study even if the member was mostly seen by nonparticipating physicians (thus the ratios of members and claims to physicians is higher than for the control group)

These are almost all employees of nationally based employers

§

Physicians were counted in the intervention group for the generic sampling intervention if they received generic samples in any year