Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 15;4(3):A60.

Table 5.

Analysis of Refusal-Interview Participants, PRISM Study, North Carolina, 2005

Race Refusal-Interview Participants (Self-Reported Race) (n = 150)% (95% CI) Weighted PRISM Frame (Adjusted E-Tech Estimated Race)a (N = 26,688)% (95% CI) PRISM Participants (Self-Reported Race)b (n = 3490)% (95% CI) Declined Refusal Interview, (Interviewer-Estimated Race)c (n = 29)% (95% CI)
Black 16.7 (10.7-22.6) 13.4 (13.0-13.8) 10.7 (9.7-11.7) 17.2 (3.5-31.0)
White 83.3 (77.4-89.3) 86.6 (86.2-87.0) 89.3 (88.3-90.3) 82.8 (69.0-96.5)

PRISM indicates Personally Relevant Information About Screening Mammography; CI, confidence interval. N values are actual (unweighted) values whereas proportions are weighted proportions.

a

Refusal-interview participants compared with weighted PRISM frame: z = 1.17, P = .24.

b

Refusal-interview participants compared with PRISM participants: χ2 = 5.2; P = .02.

c

Refusal-interview participants compared with those who declined refusal interview and for whom interviewer estimated race: χ2 = 0.06; P = .94.