Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 11;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-40

Table 1.

Top ten low back pain (LBP) research priorities identified by primary care practitioners, and results from the round 3 ranking process.

Final rank Research priority (Which areas of low back pain management would you like more information on in order to improve your practice?) Median (IQR)* Mode Rank after round 2 Present in Guidelines
1 Identifying sub-groups of patients that respond optimally to different treatments 3.5 (1.75–7.00) 1 3 No
2 Core strengthening exercises as a treatment for LBP 4 (2.00–5.25) 1 2 Yes
3 Different exercise management approaches as a treatment for LBP 4 (2.00–6.00) 2 1 Yes
4 Self-management as a treatment of LBP 5 (3.00–7.00) 3 6 No
5 Manual therapy (mobilisation/manipulation) as a treatment for LBP 5 (3.75–8.00) 4 5 Yes
6 Factors that influence the process of recovery/recurrence 5 (3.00–6.00) 5 4 Yes
7 The importance of primary care in the treatment of LBP (when, who, how long) 6 (4.00–8.25) 9 9 No
8 Identifying a cause for LBP 7 (3.00–8.25) 8 8 No
9 Identification and treatment of patients with psychosocial "yellow flags" 8 (5.00–9.00) 9 10 Yes
10 Comparison of treatment approaches by primary care professions treating LBP 9 (5.00–10.00) 10 7 No

*IQR = inter-quartile range