Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 18;93(5):591–597. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.102194

Table 4 Exercise test results at basal evaluation and at follow‐up evaluation in patients treated with spinal cord stimulation and control patients.

SCS (n = 17) Controls (n = 9) p Value
Peak exercise
 Test duration (s)
  Basal 362 (126) 313 (72) <0.05
  Follow‐up 428 (101)* 310 (86)
 Heart rate (bpm)
  Basal 123 (25) 117 (22) 0.15
  Follow‐up 132 (21) 116 (16)
 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
  Basal 138 (11) 146 (13) <0.005
  Follow‐up 160 (15)† 147 (10)
 Rate‐pressure product (bpm x mm Hg)
  Basal 17002 (3848) 17138 (3887) <0.005
  Follow‐up 21156 (4066)† 17082 (2914)
1 mm ST segment depression
 No of patients
  Basal 14 (82%) 7 (78%) 0.58
  Follow‐up 8 (47%) 7 (78%) 0.085
 Time (s)
  Basal 274 (148) 262 (99) <0.05
  Follow‐up 365 (131)‡ 268 (60)
 Heart rate (bpm)
  Basal 107 (17) 104 (14) <0.01
  Follow‐up 124 (21)‡ 103 (13)
 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
  Basal 135 (11) 136 (11) <0.05
  Follow‐up 155 (16)‡ 138 (7)
 Rate‐pressure product (bpm x mm Hg)
  Basal 14571 (3076) 14127 (2138) <0.005
  Follow‐up 19432 (4543)‡ 13984 (1972)
Angina
 No of patients
  Basal 10 (59%) 6 (67%) 0.52
  Follow‐up 9 (53%) 6 (67%) 0.40
 Time (s)
  Basal 236 (84) 254 (54) <0.05
  Follow‐up 350 (101)‡ 262 (92)
 Heart rate (bpm)
  Basal 99 (15) 101 (8) <0.01
  Follow‐up 115 (17)* 99 (8)
 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
  Basal 132 (6) 135 (8) <0.05
  Follow‐up 146 (12)‡ 137 (12)
 Rate‐pressure product (bpm x mm Hg)
  Basal 13073 (2177) 13702 (1553) <0.01
  Follow‐up 16845 (3580)‡ 13628 (2131)

SCS, spinal cord stimulation.

Values are represented as mean (SD).

*p<0.01 versus basal evaluation.

†p<0.05 versus basal evaluation.

‡p<0.005 versus basal evaluation.