Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep 15;93(5):572–578. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.096040

graphic file with name ht96040.f5.jpg

Figure 5 Rates of agreement with the expert grades for each individual endocardial surface segment calculated in 16 patients with wall motion abnormalities for the automated interpretation of wall motion from cardiac magnetic resonance images (A) and real‐time three‐dimensional echocardiography images (B). Ant, anterior; ant sept, antero‐septal; inf, inferior; lat, lateral; post, posterior; sept, septal.