Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 14;91(7):898–900. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.113290

Table 1 Key features of 43 studies on accuracy of diagnosic tests.

First author Type of test Prevalence, % Sample size (n) Screening Calculation of sample size
Budenz DL Imaging 37 172 No No
Burkat CN Clinical examination 32 202 No No
Leung CK Imaging 65 133 No No
Morgan JE Imaging 49 106 No No
PHPRG Test of visual function 53 122 No Yes
Kook MS Imaging 49 136 No No
Ben Simon GJ Imaging 27/23 131 No No
Harasymowycz PJ Imaging 7,2 303 Yes /
Jeoung JW Imaging 100 55 No No
Brusini P Functional test 32 123 No No
Sandhu SS Imaging 64 131 No No
Galvao Filho RP Imaging 63 108 No No
Spry PGD Functional test 31 48 No No
Koc F Clinical examination 36 85 No No
Grus FH Laboratory test 55 159 No No
Leung CK Imaging 27/36 111 No No
Bourne RRA Imaging 27/38 104 No No
Bowd C Imaging 56 164 No No
Patterson AJ Imaging 60 50 No No
Lin PY Clinical Examination 34 1361 No No
Ishikawa H Imaging 51 47 No No
Essock EA Imaging 50 134 No No
VPSG Functional test 32 1452 Yes /
Leung CK Imaging 70 89 No No
Bengtsson B Functional test 42 463 No No
Burgansky Z Imaging 53 89 No No
Huang M Imaging 47 189 No No
Moreno J Imaging 77 86 No No
Gelman R Imaging 38 32 No No
Martinez JM Clinical examination 100 147 No No
Smith TS Imaging 100 20 No No
van Overdam KA History 2,7 270 No No
Graham SL Functional test 51 436 No No
Radhakrishnan S Imaging 52 31 No No
Pirbhai A Imaging 52 223 No No
Ferraro JG Imaging 69 72 No No
Wollstein G Imaging 50 74 No No
Medeiros FA Imaging 53 166 No No
Migliori S Imaging 20 518 No No
Cavallerano JD Imaging 36 102 No No
Davis JL Laboratory test 14/34 78 No No
Medeiros FA Imaging 52 136 No No
Huynh SC Functional test 4,5 1765 Yes /

PHPRG, Preferential Hyperacuity Perimetry Research Group; VPSG, The Vision in Preschoolers Study Group.