Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 27;2:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-24

Table 1.

Diabetic foot documentation

Variable Total (n = 347) Audit #1 (n = 105) Audit #2 (n = 142) Audit #3 (n = 100) p Value Trend
Number of visits past year, mean ± SD 3.8 ± 2.5 3.9 ± 2.7 3.4 ± 2.6 3.8 ± 1.9 -
History or Review of Systems
 Any mention of feet? 170 (51%) 48 (49%) 63 (46%) 59 (59%) 0.16
 Any neuropathy symptoms? 107 (32%) 28 (29%) 52 (38%) 27 (27%) 0.80
 Any mention of claudication? 47 (14%) 15 (15%) 21 (15%) 11 (11%) 0.38
 Any mention of skin problem of feet? 92 (28%) 32 (33%) 36 (27%) 24 (24%) 0.16
  Any documented? 189 (55%) 59 (56%) 68 (48%) 62 (62%) 0.42
  All documented? 23 (7%) 7 (7%) 11 (8%) 5 (5%) 0.64
Prevalence of Foot Exam Abnormalities
 Any neurological abnormality? 79 (24%) 19 (19%) 36 (27%) 24 (24%) 0.45
 Any vascular abnormality? 54 (16%) 14(14%) 25 (18%) 15 (15%) 0.87
 Any skin abnormality? 82 (25%) 27 (28%) 37 (27%) 18 (18%) 0.11
  Any abnormality? 132 (38%) 37 (35%) 62 (44%) 33 (33%) 0.76
Intervention for Foot Care
 Any foot care recommendation? 72 (21%) 19 (20%) 34 (24%) 19 (19%) 0.91
 Any foot care referral? 36 (11%) 13 (13%) 17 (12%) 6 (6%) 0.10
 Any vascular evaluation referral? 13 (4%) 6 (6%) 3 (2%) 4 (4%) 0.44
  Any intervention? 87 (25%) 27 (26%) 39 (28%) 21 (21%) 0.45