Table 2.
Group 0 | Group 1 | Crude | |||||||
expose | unexposed | sum | expose | unexpose | sum | expose | unexpose | sum | |
case | 16 | 12 | 28 | 48 | 24 | 72 | 64 | 36 | 100 |
noncase | 24 | 48 | 72 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 36 | 64 | 100 |
total | 40 | 60 | 100 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 200 |
risk | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.36 | |||
RD | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.28 | ||||||
X i | 0.40 | 0.60 | |||||||
Y i | 0.28 | 0.72 | |||||||
n i | 100 | 100 |
Since background risks and exposure distributions differ between the two groups, the crude individual-level estimate of the risk difference is confounded. The ecologic estimate of the risk difference, (Y1-Y0)/(X1-X0) = 2.2, is much more confounded. RD = risk difference; Xi and Yi are the average exposure and average risk in group i; ni = size of group i.