TABLE 2.
Males | Females | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fold BAP inductiona | Control isoformb | Fold BAP inductiona | Control isoformb | |||
CYP1A | CYP1C | Fold abundance | CYP1A | CYP1C | Fold abundance | |
Heart | 18.9 ± 9.70 | 16.8 ± 9.26 | 14.6 ± 2.77 more 1A versus 1C1 | 27.9 ± 10.6 | 30.5 ± 21.8 | 14.6 ± 3.64 more 1A versus 1C1 |
Gill | 14.2 ± 2.16 | 4.47 ± 0.457 | 3.94 ± 0.478 more 1A versus 1C1 | 13.8 ± 1.47 | 6.60 ± 1.74 | 3.05 ± 0.447 more 1A versus 1C1 |
GI | 6.75 ± 3.77 | 1.20 ± 0.14 | 8.05 ± 1.23 more 1A versus 1C1 | 1.59 ± 0.46 | 1.03 ± 0.17 | 5.12 ± 1.46 more 1A versus 1C1 |
Liver | 1.43 ± 0.25 | 4.65 ± 1.26 | 27.4 ± 2.78 more 1A versus 1C1 | 1.70 ± 0.28 | 5.85 ± 1.73 | 33.1 ± 9.76 more 1A versus 1C1 |
Brain | 23.6 ± 15.7 | 1.14 ± 0.08 | 8.63 ± 1.21 more 1C1 versus 1A | 37.6 ± 20.5 | 1.13 ± 0.32 | 16.7 ± 1.63 more 1C1 versus 1A |
Eye | 12.3 ± 4.70 | 1.08 ± 0.16 | 6.27 ± 0.692 more 1C1 versus 1A | 28.2 ± 6.52 | 2.06 ± 0.422 | 3.39 ± 0.870 more 1C1 versus 1A |
Gonad | 25.1 ± 11.2 | 0.79 ± 0.40 | 108 ± 24.6 more 1C1 versus 1A | 9.71 ± 2.96 | 1.26 ± 0.39 | 65.3 ± 20.7 more 1C1 versus 1A |
Spleen | 1.61 ± 0.28 | 1.90 ± 0.86 | 39.2 ± 11.9 more 1C1 versus 1A | 12.4 ± 2.59 | 2.15 ± 0.75 | 80.8 ± 22.6 more 1C1 versus 1A |
Kidney | 2.90 ± 0.653 | 1.62 ± 0.37 | 1.14 ± 0.13 more 1C1 versus 1A | 3.00 ± 0.395 | 2.30 ± 0.37 | 1.07 ± 0.20 more 1C1 versus 1A |
Calculated by ΔΔCT approach. Data normalized to 18S expression and reported as fold induction relative to controls (n = 3–5).
Calculated by ΔΔCT approach. CYP1A and CYP1C1 expression in control animals was normalized to 18S expression and is shown as relative fold abundance.
Numbers in bold are significantly different, ANOVA p < 0.05, as analyzed on 18S corrected raw data.
Gray-shaded rows represent tissues where CYP1C1 expression was constitutively higher than CYP1A expression.