Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 1;66(6):859–868. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02825.x

Table 4.

Treatment success rates

Week/Outcome Total N = 68% (n) [95% CI] Microadenomas N = 8% (n) [95% CI]* Macroadenomas N = 60% (n) [95% CI]
Week 24
Overall treatment success 50·0 (34) 100·0 (8) 43·3 (26)
[37·3, 62·7] [63·1, 100·0] [29·9, 56·8]
Total success 26·5 (18) 75·0 (6) 20·0 (12)
[15·2, 37·8] [34·9, 96·8] [9·0, 31·0]
Partial success 23·5 (16) 25·0 (2) 23·3 (14)
[12·6, 34·4] [3·2, 65·1] [11·7, 35·0]
Week 48
Overall treatment success 47·1 (32) 75·0 (6) 43·3 (26)
[34·4, 59·7] [34·9, 96·8] [29·9, 56·8]
Total success 25·0 (17) 37·5 (3) 23·3 (14)
[13·9, 36·1] [8·5, 75·5] [11·7, 35·0]
Partial success 22·1 (15) 37·5 (3) 20·0 (12)
[11·4, 32·7] [8·5, 75·5] [9·0, 31·0]

Total success: mean of 2-h GH profile ≤ 2·5 µg/l and IGF-I levels within laboratory normal range.

Partial success: (1) mean of 2-h GH profile > 2·5 and ≤ 5·0 µg/l and either a decrease in IGF-I of at least 50% in comparison to baseline levels or IGF-I levels within laboratory normal range, or (2) mean of 2-h GH profile ≤ 2·5 µg/l and a decrease in IGF-I of at least 50% in comparison to baseline levels and IGF-I levels outside normal range.

*

Using exact calculation method because of the small number of subjects.