Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 6.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2007 Apr 20;181(2):200–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.04.006

Latency differences in day 14-day vs. day 18 performance with time to find the hidden platform. A) Adjusted mean comparisons differences in latency to find the hidden platform day 14 vs. day 18. *P<0.02 injury vs. sham. **P<0.02 MPH vs. vehicle. B) Individual group raw means difference in latency to find hidden platform day 14 vs. day 18. Pair-wise comparisons suggest that injured males treated with MPH were the only group having a significant improvement in MWM performance (*P<0.05) compared to their respective vehicle group. F=Female, M=Male, I=Injury, S=Sham, A=Vehicle, B=MPH

Latency differences in day 14-day vs. day 18 performance with time to find the hidden platform. A) Adjusted mean comparisons differences in latency to find the hidden platform day 14 vs. day 18. *P<0.02 injury vs. sham. **P<0.02 MPH vs. vehicle. B) Individual group raw means difference in latency to find hidden platform day 14 vs. day 18. Pair-wise comparisons suggest that injured males treated with MPH were the only group having a significant improvement in MWM performance (*P<0.05) compared to their respective vehicle group. F=Female, M=Male, I=Injury, S=Sham, A=Vehicle, B=MPH