Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the association of depression, sleep disturbance and menopausal symptoms with diminished libido.
Study Design
Data from a 2001-2002 baseline survey of 341 peri- and postmenopausal women, ages 45-55, participating in a randomized trial was analyzed. Eligibility included at least two hot flashes and/or night sweats per day and no hormone therapy for at least the prior 3 months. The survey evaluated sexual function, depression, sleep and vasomotor symptoms. We examined the association between these factors, using multivariate regression models.
Results
Of 341 women, 64% had diminished libido, 18% had moderate-severe depression, and 43% had poor sleep quality. Women averaged 4.6 hot flashes and 1.9 night sweats per day. Depressive symptoms (P=0.003), poor sleep (P=0.02), and night sweats (P=0.04), were significantly associated with diminished libido.
Conclusions
Factors associated with diminished libido in midlife are complex but include depression, disturbed sleep and night sweats, all common symptoms of the menopausal transition and early menopause.
Keywords: menopause, depression, sleep, vasomotor symptoms, libido
INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of diminished sexual desire or libido, in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women is estimated to be at least 40%, somewhat greater than that observed in the premenopausal years.1,2,3,4,5,6 Diminished libido, or diminished desire, includes both hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and sexual aversion disorder, and is one of 4 defined components of female sexual dysfunction (FSD).7 Along with vaginal dryness, diminished libido is the most common sexual function problem reported among postmenopausal women.4 New classification schemes with validated diagnostic instruments8,9,10,11 provide improved methodologies for the study and description of sexual function in the menopausal transition.
Known factors that may contribute to diminished libido in the menopausal transition and postmenopause appear to be similar to those recognized to impact libido in premenopausal women and include: deterioration in social status12,13; history of sexual assault14; altered relationship or intimacy with partner;4,12,13,15 duration of relationship with partner;16 dyspareunia associated with hypoestrogenism;4,15,17 medications;18 and illness.15 The Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project longitudinally evaluated sexual function in the menopausal transition and postmenopause and has shown that the most important factors influencing sexual function are prior level of sexual function, losing or gaining a partner, feelings toward a partner, and serum estradiol concentration.16 However, there exists limited information on the specific impact of depression, vasomotor symptoms, and sleep disturbances on libido. Several studies suggest depression and anxiety may contribute to diminished libido.19,20 The multiethnic Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) did not find an association of night sweats or depression with diminished libido in middle-aged women15 and to the authors’ knowledge, sleep disturbances have not been independently associated with diminished libido in the menopausal transition or postmenopause.
The strength and independence of associations of vasomotor symptoms, sleep disturbance and depression with diminished libido warrants further examination. The Herbal Alternatives for Menopause Trial (HALT) was designed to answer questions about menopausal therapies for symptomatic women in the menopausal transition and early postmenopause. We report here the baseline data on sexual desire as it relates to vasomotor symptoms, sleep disturbance, and depression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Peri- and postmenopausal women, ages 45-55, were recruited in western Washington state for a randomized placebo controlled trial investigating alternative therapies for menopause. Details on study design and methodology have been described elsewhere.21 Baseline data were used in this cross-sectional analysis.
Briefly, subjects were Group Health (GH) female enrollees identified using automated data and non-GH women identified from purchased mailing lists, all were recruited through direct mailing. Women were eligible if they had at least two hot flashes and/or night sweats per day, confirmed by self-report on baseline vasomotor symptom diaries over a two-week run-in period. In addition, women had to average six or more hot flashes or night sweats of at least moderate intensity as reported in daily diaries over the two-week period. Other entry criteria included a normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and a negative mammogram within two years prior to randomization. Women were ineligible if they had used HT in the previous three months or herbal therapies for menopause in the prior month.
At baseline, physical measurements for additional screening and study measures were recorded including the following relevant factors for this study: height, weight, current medications, supplements, vitamins and herbs. Subjects were given two weeks of daily menopause symptom diaries and questionnaires on health history and general symptoms. The health history questionnaire included questions on sexual function (IFSF)22 with the desire domain identical to that of the desire domain from the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI),8 depression (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9)23 and sleep (nine items from the General Sleep Disturbance Scale, GSDS).24 These materials were completed at home and returned at randomization.
The measurement of sexual function used by our study, Index of Female Sexual Function (IFSF) was originally validated by Kaplan, et al.22 The sexual desire domain was adapted by Rosen and colleagues in the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)8 and was subsequently tested for validity (factorial, discriminate, and divergent) and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) in 568 women with normal sexual function, female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), female orgasmic disorder (FOD), hyposexual desire disorder (HSDD) and sexual pain disorder.25 In Kaplan’s study, women with no intercourse got a score of zero on three items: lubrication, orgasm, and clitoral sensation.22 We included women with no intercourse in the preceding four weeks in our study and women with female partners; as we reasoned having desire is not necessarily impacted by the lack of a partner or the gender of a current partner. The primary outcome, libido or sexual desire, was assessed using the two questions that comprise the validated sexual desire domain from the FSFI8: a) “over the last four weeks, how often did you feel sexual desire?” (“never/almost never”=0, “a few times (less than half the time)”=1, “sometimes (about half the time)”=2, “most times (more than half the time)”=3, or “almost always/always”=4); and b) “over the past 4 weeks how would you rate your level of sexual desire?” (“none at all/very low”=0, “low”=1, “moderate”=2, “high”=3, or “very high”=4). In validation studies of the FSFI 8,10,25 women with normal libido or sexual desire consistently score above 6.0 on the sexual desire domain, with a mean of 7.7. We therefore conservatively set a score of >6.0 as normal libido. In addition, the frequencies in specific domains of overall satisfaction with sexual function (two questions), frequency of sexual activity, orgasm and clitoral sensation (one question each), and sexual quality or discomfort (two questions)22 were collected and described.
Key exposures were decided a priori and included vasomotor symptoms (with the hypothesis that night sweats would be most predictive), depressive symptoms and sleep disturbances. Menopausal symptoms were assessed with daily diaries;21 mean number of daytime symptoms and night time symptoms were assessed together and separately. Depression was measured as a total score from a nine-item depression module.23 A total score of four or less was classified as not depressed, 5-9 as mild depressive symptoms, 10-14 as moderate and at least 15 as severe. We then dichotomized depression as none to mild versus moderate to severe for our analyses. Sleep was measured using a single “sleep quality and sleepiness” scale based on nine items selected from the GSDS.24 The items ask women to rate the number of days in the past week (scale: 0=never to 7=every day) that they, for example, “Slept poorly” or “Felt tired or fatigued during the day.” Items that had the strongest correlation with one another were selected for a varimax factor analysis that indicated that a single factor fit the data best. This scale, equal to the mean of the nine items, had very high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.90). The factor analysis and high internal consistency (alpha=0.89) were confirmed using a randomly selected one-third of the data which was set-aside as a “confirmatory” dataset prior to doing the main factor analysis on a randomly selected “developmental” dataset equal to two-thirds of the observations.
Several additional factors were tested for association with the outcome (diminished libido) and the exposures (vasomotor symptoms, depression and sleep disturbance). These potential confounding variables included marital status, education, menopausal status, prior hysterectomy, self-reported health status, nulliparity, prior hormone therapy (HT) use, body mass index, physical activity score, and alcohol consumption. Women were classified as married or living as married versus not, partnered versus non-partnered, college graduate versus not, as postmenopausal (no menses for at least 12 months prior to study entry), and perimenopausal (at least one skipped menses in the 12 months prior to study entry). Prior HT use was defined as ever versus never. Body mass index, weight in kilograms per height in meters squared (measured at baseline), was dichotomized as <30 kg/m2 versus ≥30 kg/m2. Physical activity was defined as the number of episodes per week of any recreational physical activity (including walking, mild, moderate and strenuous) for at least 20 minutes duration. Significant alcohol consumption was defined as any amount, at least three times per week.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
To determine if women with diminished libido differed significantly from women with normal libido on factors measured on an ordinal/continuous scale, such as number of night sweats, we used t-tests to do unadjusted analyses comparing the means in the two groups. For binary variables, such as depression (none to mild versus moderate to severe), we used chi-square tests to evaluate whether the percentages varied significantly in the two groups. We computed Spearman correlation coefficients to assess whether our key exposure variables (depressive symptoms measured on an ordinal scale, the sleep scale, and number of vasomotor symptoms) were so strongly correlated that they could not be evaluated in the same multivariate model.
A priori, we identified factors expected to be strongly associated with libido (age, nulliparity, presence of partner) and ran logistic regression models that included these factors as covariates. These logistic models had diminished libido as the outcome, one of our key exposures as an independent variable (e.g. the sleep scale) plus the three covariates. We then compared the p-values from the adjusted and unadjusted models to assess the robustness of our results to confounding. We also fitted a single model including the three potential confounding variables and all the key exposures (depression, sleep, and night sweats). Although the overall model was highly significant (P<0.0001), due to the high correlation among some of the exposure variables (e.g. sleep and depression were highly correlated, Spearman Correlation Coefficient (SCC)=0.60), the individual regression coefficients were not significant (or interpretable) and we do not report the results of this model. The high correlations mean that it is impossible to use the regression analysis to separate the “effects” of our three key exposures from one anther. Analyses were first performed with all women with and without partners (male or female) and then again including only women with male partners. We also performed analysis excluding women with depression and compared them to the analyses including all women. Bonferroni correction for the statistical significance of the 9 secondary outcomes, sexual function characteristics in the IFSF22, was applied (P = 0.05/9 = 0.006).
RESULTS
The baseline visit was attended by 509 women; 398 (78.2%) of these were eligible, and 351 (88.2%) consented to participate. Of the 351 women who entered the study, 341 completed questions on sexual desire; 328 (96.2%) had information on partner status in the preceding four weeks. Fifty women (15%) were unpartnered and eight women (2%) had a female partner. Diminished libido, defined as diminished frequency of desire and diminished level of desire, was present in 64% of women. Analyses performed with and without the 58 women who had no partner, or a female partner, did not impact our findings.
Characteristics of the women are shown in Table 1. The mean age of participants was 52.2 years. The only significant difference between women with and without diminished libido was a higher rate of nulliparity among women with diminished libido. There were no differences between women with diminished versus normal libido in age, race, marital status, presence of partner, partner gender, years of schooling, household income, menopausal status, prior hysterectomy, self reported health status, prior use of HT, BMI, weekly exercise or alcohol consumption.
Table 1.
Characteristics of study participants.*
All Women N=341 | Normal Libido N=124 | Diminished Libido N=217 | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, mean±standard error | 52.2±0.13 | 52.2±0.22 | 52.2±0.16 |
Race | |||
Caucasian | 93% | 96% | 91% |
African American | 3% | 2% | 3% |
Other | 4% | 2% | 6% |
Married/Living as married | 74% | 73% | 74% |
Report sexual partner | 85% | 89% | 83% |
Female partner | 2% | 2% | 2% |
College graduate | 60% | 55% | 62% |
Household income over $35,000 | 82% | 81% | 83% |
Postmenopausal | 53% | 54% | 52% |
Hysterectomy (+/- unilateral oophorectomy) | 11% | 8% | 12% |
Health status excellent/very good (self-reported) | 79% | 81% | 77% |
Nulliparous (no live births)† | 28% | 21% | 31% |
Prior use of HT | 40% | 40% | 40% |
Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 | 3.2% | 34.7% | 30.7% |
Number of exercise episodes per week, ≥20 min duration, mean ± standard error | 4.8±0.23 | 5.3±0.41 | 4.5±0.28 |
Alcohol consumed at least 3 times per week | 29.0% | 34.7% | 25.8% |
Except for age and exercise, where P-values are from t-test, all P-values are from chi-square tests
P< 0.05
Very few women in the menopausal transition and postmenopause had isolated diminished libido (Table 2); a large proportion of women with diminished libido also exhibited some degree of pain or vaginal dryness with sexual activity. Dyspareunia (discomfort >50% of the time) was present in 38% of women with diminished libido versus 12.2% of women with normal libido (P< 0.001). Vaginal dryness (>50% of the time) was present in 62.5% of women with diminished libido and 39.4% of women with normal libido (P=0.0008).
Table 2.
Characteristics of sexual function.
All Women N=341 | Normal Libido N=124 | Diminished Libido N=217 | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Discomfort* (≥50% of time) | 25.7% | 12.2% | 38.0% | <.0001 |
Vaginal dryness* (≥50% of time) | 51.7% | 39.4% | 62.5% | 0.0008 |
Frequency of intercourse (<3 times/mo) | 55.6% | 33.1% | 68.5% | <.0001 |
Satisfied with sex life (<50% satisfied) | 35.6% | 22.6% | 43.4% | 0.0001 |
Satisfied with sexual relationship with partner† (<50% satisfied) | 26.4% | 13.1% | 34.9% | <.0001 |
Frequency of orgasm (<50% of time) | 35.5% | 18.3% | 48.7% | <.0001 |
Frequency of clitoral stimulation (<moderate) | 27.7% | 9.6% | 41.6% | <.0001 |
Frequency of desire§ (<50% of time) | 66.3% | 8.1% | 99.5% | <.0001 |
Level of desire§ (<moderate) | 69.5% | 16.1% | 100% | <.0001 |
Among women who attempted intercourse in past 4 weeks, N=218
Among women with a partner, N=278
Items that combined created the libido subscale for this study, N=341
Bonferroni correction for significance 0.05 /9 factors, P= 0.006
Diminished libido was associated with depressive symptoms, sleep disturbances and frequent night sweats, (Figure 1, Table 3). Use of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), or St. John’s Wort were not associated with diminished libido (P=0.98), neither was the use of sleeping medications (antihistamines, tricyclics, sedatives, Valerian) (P=0.5). Only 21 women (6.2%) used beta blockers and no association with diminished libido was observed.
Figure 1.
The association of number of vasomotor symptoms, sleep quality and depression with diminished libido
Depression assessed using PHQ-923 (scale 0=none, 15 or greater =severe)
Poor sleep quality assessed using 9 items from GSDS24 (scale 0=never, 7=daily)
Table 3.
Diminished libido and association with depressive symptoms, sleep quality and vasomotor symptoms.
All Women N=341 | Normal Libido N=124 | Diminished Libido N=217 | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Depression* | ||||
None | 47% | 54% | 43% | |
Mild | 36% | 35% | 37% | |
Moderate/severe | 18% | 11% | 21% | |
Depression score (scale of 0-20) | 5.6 ± 0.23 | 4.7 ± 0.35 | 6.1 ± 0.3 | 0.003† |
Sleep | ||||
Slept poorly§ | 43% | 39% | 46% | 0.22 |
Sleep quality poor‡ | 3.2 ± 0.17 | 2.9 ± 0.14 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 0.02† |
Vasomotor symptoms | ||||
Mean number of hot flashes | 4.6 ± 0.17 | 4.5 ± 0.26 | 4.6 ± 0.22 | 0.75 |
Mean number of night sweats | 1.9 ± 0.06 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.08 | 0.04† |
Total mean number of vasomotor symptoms | 6.5 ± 0.20 | 6.2 ± 0.33 | 6.6 ± 0.25 | 0.36 |
PHQ-923
After adjusting for age, partner presence, and nulliparity, P-value did not change
from GSDS24, 4 or greater for “sleep poorly” (scale 0=never, 7=every day)
from GSDS24, Mean of 9 items(scale 0=never, 7=every day)
Among the 341 women, 18% had major depression, and 43% experienced poor sleep quality. On subscale analysis, women with diminished libido were more likely to have increased depressive symptoms (P=0.0003) and to have poor sleep quality (P=0.02), although the magnitude of differences between the 2 groups was small. This finding persisted after adjusting for age, partner status and nulliparity. Overall, women experienced an average of 4.6 hot flashes per day and 1.9 episodes of night sweats. The mean number of hot flashes per day did not differ between women with diminished libido and women with normal libido, 4.6±0.2 and 4.5±0.3, respectively (P=0.8). The mean number of night sweats per day did differ among women with diminished libido (2.0±0.08) and women with normal libido (1.7±0.1) (P=0.04). This finding persisted after adjusting for potential confounding variables.
Poor sleep quality was highly correlated with depression, SCC=0.6 (P<0.0001) and night sweat rate, SCC=0.2 (P=0.004). The rate of night sweats also correlated with hot flash rate, SCC=0.4 (P<0.0001). Because these factors were highly correlated, we were unable to assess their independent associations with libido, however when women with depression were excluded from the bivariate analyses, the association of diminished libido with night sweats remained significant (P=0.04) and the association of diminished libido and sleep disturbance was no longer significant (P=0.1).
COMMENT
Diminished libido was observed in 64% of the women in our study. Observational studies of midlife women have generally found a lower prevalence of diminished libido than observed in our study, including SWAN15, the Massachusetts Women’s Health Study12 and the Melbourne Female Midlife Health Project.17 The difference in findings may be explained by dissimilarities in age, race, menopausal status, degree of vasomotor symptoms among the women, and recruitment strategies. Women in the HALT study had a minimum of 2 vasomotor symptoms per day. Women from SWAN were multiethnic, younger, half were premenopausal and only 6% were having daily vasomotor symptoms as compared with 100% of women in HALT. Women in the Massachusetts Women’s Health Study and the Melbourne Female Midlife Health Project were similar to our participants in ethnicity and age and were having more vasomotor symptoms than the women described in SWAN, yet the degree of vasomotor symptoms (27%) did not approach those of the HALT participants (100%). Findings of a 30-40% decrease in libido12,17 from a baseline prevalence of 30% (as demonstrated by Laumann for predominantly premenopausal women)5 may indeed be in keeping with our finding of 64% prevalence of diminished libido.
The association of vasomotor symptoms, depression and sleep disturbances with libido has not been well studied in the postmenopause or menopausal transition. We found that depressive symptoms, sleep disturbances and night sweats may be important factors associated with diminished libido. The mean differences in the number of night sweats and differences in the sleep subscale scores comparing women with diminished libido and normal libido in our study were small, but statistically significant. The clinical significance of 0.3 fewer night sweats per 24 hours in the group with normal libido and a difference of 0.4 on a 7 point scale of sleep between the 2 groups may be debated. In addition, when women with depression were excluded from the analysis, sleep was no longer significantly associated with diminished libido.
To our knowledge, there are no previous studies that have described these associations with the exception of a study by Gracia, et al, who found that women with depression had a three-fold increased risk for diminished libido19 and the Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project which showed “well-being” that was influenced by “vasomotor symptoms, insomnia and stress” impacted sexual function.16 SWAN investigators did not report an association of diminished desire with self-reported depression or night sweats, although their participants had a low prevalence of night sweats overall.15
Consistent with findings by Dennerstein and colleagues,4,17 and in contrast to findings from SWAN15 we found that women with dyspareunia or vaginal dryness were more apt to have diminished libido. The women in the HALT study were required to be off any hormonal therapies for three months as part of the study entry criteria. It was therefore not unexpected that a large percentage of women reported these symptoms. Among women with diminished libido in our study, 38% (versus 12% of women with normal libido, P=<0.001) reported dyspareunia and 62.5% (versus 39% of women with normal libido, P=0.0008) reported vaginal dryness. Others have described an association of diminished libido with factors other than depression, poor sleep and vasomotor symptoms. These factors, including antidepressant use, menopausal status and chronic illness, were also assessed in our study. In contrast to previous studies we did not find an association of diminished libido with antidepressant medication use,18,20 but only 41 women (11.7%) were using antidepressant medications with an additional 13 women (3.8%) reporting use of an over the counter medication for depression, like St. John’s Wort. Also, as described by SWAN investigators15 but in contrast to studies by Avis, et al,12 and Dennerstein, et al,4 we did not find a difference in libido between women in the menopausal transition versus early postmenopause. And, as the women in the HALT study were by definition, relatively healthy, we did not find an association of diminished libido with chronic disease.12,15
There are multiple strengths to this study. We had a relatively large sample size with well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The amount of baseline data collected allowed us to evaluate complex associations. None of the women were taking hormonal therapies and we had the ability to control for all medications that might affect our outcome. The outcomes and exposures were carefully measured and well defined using validated instruments.8,9,10,23,25 The sleep scale used in this study24 was validated by factor analysis and had very high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91).
There are several limitations to this study. The data were cross sectional and therefore we were unable to assess changes through the menopausal transition and postmenopausal period. Women were not taking any hormones, so our study does not address the effect of HT on these associations and the majority of the women in our study were White. All participants were experiencing vasomotor symptoms, were recruited specifically for a randomized controlled trial and were willing to be randomized to placebo, herbal therapies plus or minus a soy dietary intervention or HT, thus we caution the reader as to the generalizability of our findings. The importance of the level of distress from any degree of sexual dysfunction was not assessed. We were unable to study the importance of other previously described risk factors for diminished libido, including deterioration in social status, duration of relationship with partner, history of sexual assault, and diminishing hormone levels16,26 as these data were not collected. Others have shown that relationships with partner, body image, “issues related to midlife” such as children living at home12,13,16,19 affect sexual desire. Although we did not have information about children living at home, we did find that women who were nulliparous, and therefore unlikely to have children living in the home, were less likely to have normal libido, a finding opposite to that anticipated based on Gracia’s findings that diminished libido is associated with children living in the home.19 We also found that women with diminished libido were less apt “to be satisfied with their partner”, P<0.0001, a finding that is consistent with that of Basson, et al, who found that “diminished emotional intimacy” with partner is associated with diminished libido13 and findings from the Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project16 showing the impact of “feelings toward a partner” on sexual desire.
The complexities of sexual function are well known; these complexities are potentially magnified by changes that occur at menopause. Studies that continue to tease apart the inter-related factors associated with libido and sexual function in the menopausal transition and early postmenopausal period are important as we attempt to prioritize and give clinical weight to various therapeutic interventions. Addressing depression with nonpharmacologic therapies, and treating difficulties with sleep and vasomotor symptoms experienced at night may be important steps toward improvement of libido in the midlife. However, it is important to bear in mind that the significance of these factors for women is most likely overshadowed by the importance of intimate relationships with their partners.
Acknowledgements
We thank Linda Palmer RN, and Jill Seymour, RN, ARNP, for their dedicated work with study participants.
Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute on Aging, and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Grant # R01AG17057, Alternative Therapies for Menopause: A Randomized Trial
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Reprints are not available.
CONDENSATION
Significant factors associated with diminished libido in the peri- and early postmenopause are complex but include depression, disturbed sleep and night sweats.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pisani G, Facioni L, Fiorani F, Pisani G.Psychosexual problems in menopause [Article in Italian] Minerva Ginecol 19985077–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nappi RE, Verde JB, Polatti F, Genazzani AR, Zara C. Self-reported sexual symptoms in women attending menopause clinics. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;53:181–7. doi: 10.1159/000058371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Olofsson AS, Collins A. Psychosocial factors, attitude to menopause and symptoms in Swedish perimenopausal women. Climacteric. 2000;3:33–42. doi: 10.3109/13697130009167597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dennerstein L, Dudley E, Burger H. Are changes in sexual functioning during midlife due to aging or menopause? Fertil Steril. 2001;76:456–60. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01978-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blumel JE, Araya H, Riquelme R, Castro G, Sanchez F, Gramegna G.Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in climacteric women. Influence of menopause and hormone replacement therapy [Article in Spanish] Rev Med Chil 20021301131–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anastasiadis AG, Davis AR, Ghafar MA, Burchardt M, Shabsigh R. The epidemiology and definition of female sexual disorders. World J Urol. 2002;20:74–8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-002-0272-5. Epub 2002 May 3.
- 8.Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26:191–208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jones le RA. The use of validated questionnaires to assess female sexual dysfunction. World J Urol. 2002;20:89–92. doi: 10.1007/s00345-002-0268-1. Epub 2002 May 30.
- 10.Meston CM. Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29:39–46. doi: 10.1080/713847100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Basson R, Leiblum S, Brotto L, et al. Revised definitions of women’s sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2004;1:40–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Avis NE, Stellato R, Crawford S, Johannes C, Longcope C. Is there an association between menopause status and sexual functioning? Menopause. 2000;7:297–309. doi: 10.1097/00042192-200007050-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Basson R. Using a different model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. J Sex Marital Ther. 2001;27:395–403. doi: 10.1080/713846827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Becker JV, Skinner LJ, Abel GG, Cichon J. Level of postassault sexual functioning in rape and incest victims. Arch Sex Behav. 1986;15:37–49. doi: 10.1007/BF01542303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Avis NE, Zhao X, Johannes CB, Ory M, Brockwell S, Greendale GA. Correlates of sexual function among multi-ethnic middle-aged women: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Menopause. 2005;12:385–98. doi: 10.1097/01.GME.0000151656.92317.A9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dennerstein L, Lehert P, Burger H. The relative effects of hormones and relationship factors on sexual function of women through the natural menopausal transition. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:174–80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dennerstein L, Lehert P, Burger H, Dudley E. Factors affecting sexual functioning of women in the mid-life years. Climacteric. 1999;2:254–62. doi: 10.3109/13697139909038085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Clayton AH, Pradko JF, Croft HA, et al. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction among newer antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:357–66. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n0414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gracia CR, Sammel MD, Freeman EW, Liu L, Hollander L, Nelson DB. Predictors of decreased libido in women during the late reproductive years. Menopause. 2004;11:144–50. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000082147.01218.cf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Channon LD, Ballinger SE. Some aspects of sexuality and vaginal symptoms during menopause and their relation to anxiety and depression. Br J Med Psychol. 1986;59:173–80. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1986.tb02682.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Newton KM, Reed SD, Grothaus L, Ehrlich K, Guiltinan J, LaCroix AZ. Herbal Alternatives for Menopause (HALT) Study: Background and Study Design. Maturitas. 2005;52:134–46. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaplan SA, Reis RB, Kohn IJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of sildenafil in postmenopausal women with sexual dysfunction. Urology. 1999;53:481–6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00633-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9 valididty of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee KA. Self-reported sleep disturbances in employed women. Sleep. 1992;15:493–8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/15.6.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Weigel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marit Therap. 2005;31:1–20. doi: 10.1080/00926230590475206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Basson R. Clinical practice. Sexual desire and arousal disorders in women. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1497–506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp050154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]