The case for calcium involvement |
1. [Ca2+]i oscillates in sinusoidal manner in Xenopus embryos at division frequency (5–7). |
2. [Ca2+]i spikes at mitosis entry and mitosis exit in sea urchin embryos (2, 3, 12). |
3. [Ca2+]i signals persist in absence of division in both Xenopus and sea urchin embryos (3, 5, 6). |
4. Elevated [Ca2+]i induces nuclear envelope breakdown (mitosis start), presumably through activation of MPF (12, 13). |
4′. [Ca2+]i may activate MPF through Cdc25 (14). |
5. A [Ca2+]i signal is necessary to induce nuclear envelope breakdown, but it is effective only after sufficient protein synthesis (13). |
6. Elevated [Ca2+]i induces cyclin destruction (mitosis exit), presumably through deactivation of MPF (11, 15, 16, 28). |
6′. [Ca2+]i deactivates MPF through the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis pathway (15). |
7. BAPTA calcium buffers delay division in intact Xenopus blastomeres (8). |
8. High-concentration calcium buffer injections block division cycles (8, 12, 13). |
The case that MPF oscillations are independent of calcium |
9. Addition of exogenous cyclin mRNA produces multiple cell cycles in Xenopus extracts (9). |
10. Division cycles in clam embryo homogenates are not affected by injection of calcium buffers or CaCl2 (11). |